Value of Measuring Satisfaction
Overall, the integration of patient perspectives
into healthcare has moved the focus from an
episodic healthcare model to a care continuum.
This has benefitted such changes as electronic
records access. How well health care providers
integrate patient empowerment and experience
into health management and accountable care may
determine their effectiveness in providing
effective and efficient care. Early on in the
implementation of the ACA in 2011, patient
experience and quality of care were among the
concerns of nurse leaders reported by
HealthLeaders Media. They noted that every
person’s job in a health care environment
contributes to the same goals and that a
“commitment to patient experience ties into the
organization’s overarching goals for safe,
quality patient care for all.”
Focus has moved from episodic care to
care continuum
Providers must integrate patient
experience into health management
All healthcare workers must work toward
the same goals for the patient |
|
History of Patient Satisfaction Concerns
Research on patient satisfaction dimensions were
conducted in early to mid-1970s
Patient satisfaction was conceptualized by the
Southern Illinois University School of Medicine
under funding by the National Center For Health
Services Research and Development yielding in
the early 1970s. The result was the Patient
Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ). A subsequent
report work in 1984 identified key results from
technical reports issued in the mid-1970s to
translate the work for practical use. The
contention was that reliable and valid measures
of patient satisfaction could be important to
planning, administration, and evaluation of
health services delivery programs.
Organizations were formed to evaluate patient
satisfaction in 1985
Around 1985 two Notre Dame professors created
Press Ganey started work that tracked patient
satisfaction for comparison of hospitals, which
was considered a valuable marketing opportunity.
This was expanded to other settings and the
complexity of data, analysis, and reporting
increased. Press Ganey and other survey
companies used data to provide guidance on
improvement of patient satisfaction scores.
The federal government became involved in
2002
The Hospital Consumer Assessment of
Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS)
standardized survey was developed through
CMS and AHRQ
The HCAHPS was implemented in 2006
Financial incentives received for participation
by hospitals in 2007 and strengthened by the
Affordable Care Act in 2010
Now we can discuss why documentation is
especially important in the care and treatment
of wounds. First, objective documentation of the
wound is required to generate and monitor a
wound management plan and, as treatment
progresses, to determine if their treatment is
clinically-, and cost-effective. Documentation
is used to create a baseline and evaluate any
progress in wound healing
(or the non-progression of wound healing). Any
stalls in wound healing, such as infection or
the patient’s ability to adhere to recommended
wound care, are documented to allow the team to
adjust care plans and work toward
patient-centered care.
Importance of Patient Satisfaction
The HealthLeaders Media Industry Survey of 2013
showed that, “Patient experience and
satisfaction was included among the top three
priorities by 54% of respondents, putting it at
the top of the list for the second consecutive
year. With the introduction of value-based
purchasing and its link to HCAHPS, the federal
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services has
turned up the heat in order to transform patient
satisfaction from a marketing opportunity to a
meaningful measure with clear fiscal
implications.”
Patient Satisfaction and Experience a top
priority for healthcare industry
Patient Satisfaction now tied to
reimbursement by Medicare
|
|