|
Bioelectrical
Impedance Analysis |
course
development services provided by
|
Body Composition Evaluation
Hormonal alterations produced by
stress responses, tumor production, and other disease-related
conditions initially influence fluid shifts and maintenance of
BCM. A typical response includes the reduction of potassium in
intracellular spaces and an elevation in levels of extracellular
water. The reduction of intracellular potassium leads to a
reduction in cell membrane potential, an increase in
intracellular sodium, and diminished electrical charge-holding
capability. Hydration of lean tissues may alter from a normal
0.5-0.7 upward to 1.0 or greater. These edematous changes occur
long before the serious clinical signs that would be found on
physical exam. Obvious bone density changes may or may not
occur, depending on weight loss and hormonal balance. If
malnutrition comes into play, nutritional treatment is essential
to reverse these detrimental changes.
Other methods
of body composition evaluation have included air displacement,
near-infrared interactance, biochemical evaluation, and bioelectrical
impedance evaluation.
In the air displacement
method, body volume is calculated using an enclosed portable
container that determines the difference between empty chamber air
volume and air volume with a person sitting in the container. This
method assumes a relationship between body weight, body volume, and body
density.[29]
Infrared interactance is based on the variations in chemical
composition of fat and lean tissues of the body. Regional composition,
specifically the biceps area, may be evaluated with this technology.
However, whole body composition cannot be generalized from the
calculation of a single region reading.18
Creatinine excretion
from a 24-hour urine collection has been used to estimate FFM as shown
in Figure 1.
[30]
|
|
Figure 1.
Fat-Free Mass Estimation by Creatinine Excretion |
FFM (kg) = 22.2 x creatinine (grams/day) + 25.1
± 8.8 |
(r=0.7; p=0.01) |
Bioelectrical impedance evaluation,
the main topic of this course (remember?), is based on the concept that the body
acts as an electrical resistor and capacitor. Water content and other body
chemical substances can conduct and hold electrical charge, while body
structures resist or impede electrical charge. A small amount of electricity is
introduced into the body and readings of resistance and reactance are captured
at another site. The resistance reading is dependent upon electrical pathway
length, volume, ionic composition, and current frequency. The estimations based
on these properties must overcome the human body’s lack of uniformity for
length, cross-sectional area, and ionic composition, making it difficult to
accurately predict body compartment volumes.[31]
The accuracy and precision of the estimates derived from BIA measures
depends greatly on the method used (hand to hand, foot to foot,
or hand to foot), the individual’s position during measurement, any
deviation from tested “norms” in body shape or health status, and the
equations that are used. With additional information on sex, height and
weight, regression equations are used to estimate lean and fat tissues.
Data on tetrapolar BIA measures were gathered as a part of the NHANES
III (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 1988-1991 and
1991-1994). This data has been distributed to several body composition
laboratories for ongoing evaluation and represents a total of 8,586 men
and 9,209 women with wide ranges of body composition.[32]
|
This course will
concentrate on the tetrapolar method of bioelectrical impedance evaluation
because of its growing popularity and potential applications in a wide variety
of settings and with a wide variety of populations ranging from persons who are
healthy to those with acute and/or chronic disease. No claims are made about the
"perfection" of this type of evaluation in this course. Indeed, there are many
types of evaluations that may claim greater accuracy and/or precision. However,
small hand-held single-frequency BIA machines are owned and operated in many
clinical settings because of their ease and clinical use of the interpreted
results. It is our hope that this course will assist these clinicians in making
BIA a more useful tool in their practices.
Click here to go to
BIA vs. Other Methods
(next section)
|