Alternate Payment Models
Alternative payment models (not just
penalty-only programs), on the other
hand, are more difficult for providers
to adopt. The Centers for Medicare and
Medicaid Services
(CMS)
have now reported that in 2016 Medicare
linked 30% of traditional
fee-for-service payments to value-based
purchasing models—and saved nearly $1
billion(!)1,
and that by the end of 2018 are
expecting that percentage to increase to
90%.2
|
•Why
is CMS so interested in alternative
payment models?
1.
current “a la carte” billing system
2.
electronic health records system
3.
billing to patients too confusing
4.
fee-for-service does not encourage
quality care
|
There were several reasons for this.
First,
there was
the existing “a la carte” healthcare billing
process.
Bill the patient for each and every visit and
procedure, even duplicates.
You can see the problem:
See a patient once, get paid once--See that
patient twice, get paid twice.
Second,
there was
the electronic health records system built from
this billing process
which was designed around a quantity of care,
not quality of care, model.3
Third,
there was
the issue of a billing environment so convoluted
and confusing
that consumers didn’t know what they were paying
for, nor sometimes how much to pay.
And
fourth,
and this has been the principal driver of the
need for change,
the fee-for-service system does nothing to
encourage providers to give quality care.