Sample Criteria for Alginate of
Other Fiber Gelling Dressing
Let’s look at a
sample of the criteria for coverage for a particular dressing. In this case, we
will look at what is required to determine that an alginate or other fiber
gelling dressing is medically necessary. These types of dressings are indicated
for wounds that have moderate to high amounts of drainage and are
full-thickness--or have wound cavities. These are Stage III-IV wounds and need
to be documented as such. These dressings are not indicated in cases of dry
wounds or eschar-covered wounds, and they are also not indicated for use in
combination with hydrogels.
Dressing change
frequency is generally once per day. Any other frequency must be adequately
justified in the documentation. One sheet that matches the size of the wound per
day or up to two units of wound filler can be allowed for each dressing change.
Indicated for:
Moderately to highly exudative,
full-thickness wounds or wound cavities (Stage III-IV)
Not
indicated for:
Dry wounds, eschar-covered
wounds
Use in combination with
hydrogels
Dressing change 1x/day
Amount
One sheet for approximate size
of wound or
Up to 2 units of wound filler
for each change
|
Example of Alginate Surgical Dressings Denial
Medical necessity must be established for specific dressings,
such as alginate surgical dressings. A 2016 review on advances in skin and wound
care discussed claim denials due to a lack of adequate and appropriate
documentation. (Schaum, 2016)
We can look at
an example from the review that showed 92% of claims for alginate surgical
dressings were denied. The lack of documentation for wound debridement, moderate
to high drainage of full thickness wounds, or stage III to IV wounds (without
supporting documentation) has led to claim denials. Claim denials were issued if
the wound evaluation documentation didn’t include type, location, size, depth,
and/or drainage amount.
Orders must
also specify the quantity or frequency of dressing changes for each category of
surgical dressing that the patient may require. And lastly, number five in this
top five reasons for a denial of claims was that no medical records were
submitted when they were requested by the insurer.
1.Wound
debridement not documented
2.Documentation
not supportive of moderate-high exudative full-thickness (stage
III-IV) wounds
3.Wound
evaluation did not include type, location, size, depth, or drainage
amount
4.Order
did not specify quantity or frequency of dressing change
5.No
medical records were submitted when requested
|
|
Tips for Improving Documentation and
Reimbursement
Now
let’s take a look at how we can improve documentation of
wounds for more complete communication and to improve accurate coverage.
The Scope of Practice and Standards of Practice for nurses can guide us in what,
and what not, to do.
A visual
inspection of wounds should provide information useful in documenting the wound
such as its location, size, stage or depth, color, tissue type, drainage/exudate,
erythema, and the condition directly around the wounds. Documentation is not
about guessing. If something is not clearly determined, documentation may read
something like, “depth cannot be determined” or that the wound is “unstageable”.
It can also recommend a consult by a wound care expert.
A pressure
injury risk assessment should be completed, such as the Braden Scale, and is
usually dictated by the facility guidelines. It is important not to use previous
risk assessment scores because they do not reflect the picture at the moment.
Use precise
language in the documentation for others to better understand what was done. For
example, rather than saying that the physician is aware, documenting the
relevant discussion will be more useful.
Include all
pertinent information, such as patient condition, wound parameters, pain level,
and interventions. Document it in a checklist, when appropriate. Rather than
writing “dressing changed” or “dressing dry and intact”, a checklist that is
consistent can be used.
Describe type, location, size, stage or depth, tissue
type, drainage, erythema, peri-wound conditions
Perform pressure injury risk assessment
Document changes in wound, patient condition, or
interventions
Document a change in wound category
Follow HIPAA guidelines for photos of wounds
Document patient risk factors, comorbidities, and
other conditions that lead to pressure injuries
|
Document wound category changes.
For instance, note in the record if a skin tear becomes a pressure injury or if
a pressure injury becomes a surgical wound after surgical repair, or if a deep
tissue injury becomes a stage IV pressure injury. Also, differentiate
end-of-life wounds (may be referred to as SCALE or Skin Changes at Life’s End)
from pressure injuries and other wounds.
It will also be
important to
document patient adherence with the plan of care, including
conversations, education, and other plans or interventions to improve adherence.
Remember that it is not your place to be judgmental, but documentation and even
discharge from care may be required in some cases. If care is refused, be sure
that you document the details of the refusal and the education and options that
were offered. But, it is important to remember that a patient has the right to
refuse.
When
photographing wounds, it will be important to follow facility guidelines,
especially on storing and protecting the photos.
If conditions
create an unavoidable circumstance for pressure injuries, note the risk factors,
comorbidities, and conditions in the medical record.