Measuring Performance
More
than 90 percent of the health plans in the U.S. use
the
Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) to measure
performance on important dimensions of care and service. And because
there are many health plans collecting HEDIS data, and because the
measures are so specifically defined, HEDIS makes it possible to
compare the performance of health plans on an "apples-to-apples"
basis. Additionally, the health plans use HEDIS data internally to
compare to their own results to see where they need to improve.
The
performance measures developed for HEDIS have been culled from best
practices for various procedures and treatment guidelines from
across the country. These best practices are derived from the
standards of care for that particular condition, and standardized
for all patients who present similarly.
For instance, there are HEDIS measures in place for the following
conditions,
and the standards of care for each were used in their development:
HEDIS
(Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set)
Allow comparison of health plans and improvement within a
health plan
Examples of SoC
used to develop HEDIS measures:
Asthma medication use
Persistence of beta-blocker treatment after a heart attack
Controlling high blood pressure
Comprehensive diabetes care
Breast cancer screening
Antidepressant medication management
Childhood and adult weight/BMI assessment |
HEDIS
To ensure that HEDIS guidelines stay
current, each year the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA)
determines if each particular guideline needs to evolve. The NCQA’s
Committee on Performance Measurement, a broad-based group
representing employers, consumers, health plans and others,
discusses the current content and makes collective decisions as to
how each standard should change for the coming year. Individual
standards are field tested to assure appropriateness and accuracy,
and then implemented. It’s also important to note that HEDIS
includes the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems
or CAHPS 5.0 survey which measures health plan member’s satisfaction
with claims processing, customer service and the perceived speed of
getting care when needed.
HEDIS
information may also be used by consumers to view comparison
information for participating health plans. This can be helpful when
shopping for health insurance, and is an “available for purchase”
option for health plans through the NCQA.
Annual review by NCQA (National Committee for Quality
Assurance)
Includes the CAHPS Survey (Consumer Assessment of Healthcare
Providers and Systems)
Can be used by consumers to compare participating health
plans |
|
Development and Adoption of Standards of Care
To achieve standardization, options are
reviewed:
What achieves best results?
Thorough evidence-based review
Field tests are performed
Feasibility, reliability, validity
SOC put into practice and endorsed by
professional societies or consumer groups |
|
Developing a standard of care is a multistep process that begins
with a need.
When government agencies like the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid
Services (CMS) or the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality (AHRQ),
or private nonprofits like the Joint Commission on Accreditation of
Health Care Organizations (JCAHO) or the National Committee for
Quality Assurance (NCQA), or for-profit companies see a medical
condition whose treatment could benefit from standardization, they
look at the options currently available. From there an evaluation of
medical literature is performed with an eye towards what achieves
the best results (improved outcome or patient experience, lower cost
or some other measure). If enough compelling evidence exists for one
method of care over another, field tests are performed.
If the field testing matches expectations and provides support for
the feasibility, reliability and validity of the new standard, it is
approved by the organization and put into their practice.
An
example of this might be that research has found administering a
beta blocker as soon as possible to a patient who is experiencing a
heart attack can reduce the risk of death. This protocol was
researched and tested, then developed into a clinical practice
guideline.
Once
a standard is put into practice other professional societies or
consumer groups will endorse the measure. Some groups, like the AHRQ
(Agency for Health Care Research and Quality)
will
meet with their stakeholders, including health care professionals,
consumers, payers (such as insurance companies), employers, or
hospitals to review new measures and decide if they meet their
criteria. Measures endorsed by organizations like the nonprofit
National Quality Forum (NQF) are generally recognized as reflecting
a thorough scientific and evidence-based review. If the measure
meets their criteria and is successful in field testing, it receives
their endorsement and is generally put into widespread use.