Sample Criteria for Alginate of 
Other Fiber Gelling Dressing
Let’s look at a 
sample of the criteria for coverage for a particular dressing. In this case, we 
will look at what is required to determine that an alginate or other fiber 
gelling dressing is medically necessary. These types of dressings are indicated 
for wounds that have moderate to high amounts of drainage and are 
full-thickness--or have wound cavities. These are Stage III-IV wounds and need 
to be documented as such. These dressings are not indicated in cases of dry 
wounds or eschar-covered wounds, and they are also not indicated for use in 
combination with hydrogels. 
Dressing change 
frequency is generally once per day. Any other frequency must be adequately 
justified in the documentation. One sheet that matches the size of the wound per 
day or up to two units of wound filler can be allowed for each dressing change.
	
		| 
		
		Indicated for:  
			  Moderately to highly exudative, 
			full-thickness wounds or wound cavities (Stage III-IV) 
		Not 
		indicated for: 
			  Dry wounds, eschar-covered 
			wounds 
			  Use in combination with 
			hydrogels 
		
		Dressing change 1x/day 
		
		Amount 
			  One sheet for approximate size 
			of wound or 
			  Up to 2 units of wound filler 
			for each change | 
Example of Alginate Surgical Dressings Denial
Medical necessity must be established for specific dressings, 
such as alginate surgical dressings. A 2016 review on advances in skin and wound 
care discussed claim denials due to a lack of adequate and appropriate 
documentation.  (Schaum, 2016)
We can look at 
an example from the review that showed 92% of claims for alginate surgical 
dressings were denied. The lack of documentation for wound debridement, moderate 
to high drainage of full thickness wounds, or stage III to IV wounds (without 
supporting documentation) has led to claim denials. Claim denials were issued if 
the wound evaluation documentation didn’t include type, location, size, depth, 
and/or drainage amount. 
Orders must 
also specify the quantity or frequency of dressing changes for each category of 
surgical dressing that the patient may require. And lastly, number five in this 
top five reasons for a denial of claims was that no medical records were 
submitted when they were requested by the insurer. 
	
		| 
			1.Wound 
			debridement not documented 
			2.Documentation 
			not supportive of moderate-high exudative full-thickness (stage 
			III-IV) wounds 
			3.Wound 
			evaluation did not include type, location, size, depth, or drainage 
			amount 
			4.Order 
			did not specify quantity or frequency of dressing change 
		 
			5.No 
			medical records were submitted when requested | .h5.jpg) | 
 
Tips for Improving Documentation and 
Reimbursement
Now 
let’s take a look at how we can improve documentation of 
wounds for more complete communication and to improve accurate coverage. 
The Scope of Practice and Standards of Practice for nurses can guide us in what, 
and what not, to do. 
A visual 
inspection of wounds should provide information useful in documenting the wound 
such as its location, size, stage or depth, color, tissue type, drainage/exudate, 
erythema, and the condition directly around the wounds. Documentation is not 
about guessing. If something is not clearly determined, documentation may read 
something like, “depth cannot be determined” or that the wound is “unstageable”. 
It can also recommend a consult by a wound care expert. 
A pressure 
injury risk assessment should be completed, such as the Braden Scale, and is 
usually dictated by the facility guidelines. It is important not to use previous 
risk assessment scores because they do not reflect the picture at the moment.
Use precise 
language in the documentation for others to better understand what was done. For 
example, rather than saying that the physician is aware, documenting the 
relevant discussion will be more useful. 
Include all 
pertinent information, such as patient condition, wound parameters, pain level, 
and interventions. Document it in a checklist, when appropriate. Rather than 
writing “dressing changed” or “dressing dry and intact”, a checklist that is 
consistent can be used. 
	
		| 
			Describe type, location, size, stage or depth, tissue 
			type, drainage, erythema, peri-wound conditions 
			Perform pressure injury risk assessment 
			Document changes in wound, patient condition, or 
			interventions 
			Document a change in wound category 
			Follow HIPAA guidelines for photos of wounds 
			Document patient risk factors, comorbidities, and 
			other conditions that lead to pressure injuries | 
 
Document wound category changes. 
For instance, note in the record if a skin tear becomes a pressure injury or if 
a pressure injury becomes a surgical wound after surgical repair, or if a deep 
tissue injury becomes a stage IV pressure injury. Also, differentiate 
end-of-life wounds (may be referred to as SCALE or Skin Changes at Life’s End) 
from pressure injuries and other wounds. 
It will also be 
important to 
document patient adherence with the plan of care, including 
conversations, education, and other plans or interventions to improve adherence.
Remember that it is not your place to be judgmental, but documentation and even 
discharge from care may be required in some cases. If care is refused, be sure 
that you document the details of the refusal and the education and options that 
were offered. But, it is important to remember that a patient has the right to 
refuse.
When 
photographing wounds, it will be important to follow facility guidelines, 
especially on storing and protecting the photos. 
If conditions 
create an unavoidable circumstance for pressure injuries, note the risk factors, 
comorbidities, and conditions in the medical record.