Blood Sugar Management
As
people with diabetes there are some problems and disease threats
that pose higher risks for us than other individuals without
diabetes. These are called complications.
For
the sake of today’s education we will focus primarily on those
complications directly related to blood sugar dysregulation itself,
and living with a chronic and, thus far, incurable disease.
Language matters! Stigma kills!
As
we explore diabetes-related complications it is important to be
aware of the impact of our language and attitudes as clinicians in
the lives of our patients.
We
must avoid judgmental language that can not only impact our
patients’ emotional lives, but also inhibit their clinical progress.
Diabetic – Person With Diabetes (PWD)
Diabetic complication - Diabetes Related Complication
Caused by diabetes/high blood sugars – Correlated to
Intimidation/scare tactics – empowerment and empathy
Never base therapy escalation on “Success” or “Failure”
|
|
To
label a patient as “Diabetic” implies a disregard for the individual
and their personhood beyond their disease. Instead reach for a
phrase like Person with diabetes, or Person living with diabetes.
Likewise referring to any complication as a “Diabetic” complication
implies that diabetes alone is responsible for this health issue.
This may or may not be true. As we discussed earlier, a patient can
do everything “Right” and still have complication onset. So we
should refer to complications as being diabetes RELATED. And
besides, people without diabetes get retinopathy, neuropathy and
other common diseases states related to diabetes as well. So
labeling these diseases as “diabetes complications” may be placing
blame where it does not even belong! It may lead to clinical biases
that can cause us to miss the true, or full range of causal factors
involved in a medical issues.
We should also use language that says that complication risk is
correlated with blood sugar levels or the presence of diabetes. Not
“caused by”, as this is blaming language, and may not be clinically
accurate.
Finally, we should not base our therapy needs on success or failure
of the patient. For example language like “We will try diet
adjustment, but if you can’t get blood sugars down we need to start
medication” The reality is that some patients can have a perfect
diet and workout regimen and will still need medications to meet the
needs of their physiology. Focus therapy choices on metabolic needs
and supporting wellness rather than repercussions of failed efforts.
A better conversation would have been “We know that diet and
exercise are two ways we can impact blood sugars, but those alone
may not be sufficient to meet your body’s needs. So let’s take a
trial period and see how much improvement we can get from diet and
exercise alone and reassess how we can meet your body’s needs fully
in another 3 months” (then set some specific, measurable, realistic
and sustainable goals for the next 3 months).