Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis

Trending Information

 

The most value in providing BIA services and individual interpretations may be in the trending of body compartments.  Why and how body compartment volumes move can tell you a great deal about the physiologic processes that may be occurring.  Table 9 shows different profiles of body compartment change according to conditions that may affect nutritional stores.

Table 9.  Categories of Body Compartment Change

Category

Weight

Body Cell Mass

Extracellular Mass

Fat

Optimal Profile

Reference range

Reference range

Reference range

Reference range

Athletic

Reference range or increased

Increased

Adequate

Adequate or decreased

Starvation

Decreased

Decreased

Decreased

Decreased

Infection/Injury (Stress)

Reference range or decreased

Decreased

Increased

Eventually decreased

Obesity

Increased

Increased

Increased

Increased

Sarcopenic Obesity

Increased

Decreased

Increased

Increased

Athletic Obesity

Increased

Increased

Increased

Increased

  Calorie deprivation can cause a decrease in all compartments.  Generally speaking, fat will comprise about 60% of this type of weight loss.[85]  Injury or infection may or may not yield a weight loss, but can change body composition dramatically.  The hallmark change in stress responses is the increase in extracellular mass.  If weight is lost during a rousing stress response, it is likely to be less than 10-20% fat tissues.  Once starvation or stress is resolved, you will be looking for normalization of the body compartments.  If this does not happen, especially if body cell mass continues to be compromised while weight gain is primarily fat, then you may suspect some type of metabolic adaptation or dysfunction that prevents normalization.  

Obesity as a function of caloric excess shows much the opposite of starvation: all compartments should increase.  Remember that BCM increases are expected because of the additional muscle it takes to carry additional weight around.  If reduced mobility follows, or if there is a metabolic alteration that prevents maintenance of this added body cell mass, sarcopenic obesity may result.  The characteristics of sarcopenic obesity differ from “normal” obesity when the individual has less than expected levels of body cell mass.  On the opposite hand, we might evaluate an athletic-type who is considered obese by weight, but are certainly a lower health risk by body composition evaluation.  This person may have more than expected lean tissues and varying amounts of fat mass. 

In trending body composition by BIA, it is important to know the conditions that change weight and its three compartments.  A summary of this information is shown in Table 10.

Table 10.  Summary of Physiologic Basis for Body Compartment Changes

Body Compartment Changes

Examples of Etiologies for Change

Weight: Increased

Calories: refeeding or overfeeding

Recovery from stress

Weight: Decreased

Calories: starvation (imbalance through reduced intake or absorption, or increased utilization)

Stress (especially when inadequate calories are consumed)

BCM: Increased

Appropriate response to refeeding, overfeeding

Appropriate response to recovery from stress

Exercise

Anabolic medications (such as testosterone and derivatives and growth hormone)

BCM: Decreased

Calories: starvation

Stress response: catabolism of skeletal muscle

Metabolic alteration: altered hormonal balances or sensitivity to endogenous anabolic hormones

ECT: Increased

Increased weight

Stress response

Rehydration

Chronic adaptation to stress response

ECT: Decreased

Decreased weight

Stress response resolve

Dehydration

Anabolic therapies (if responding normally)

Fat: Increased

Refeeding or overfeeding

Reduced activity/mobility

Chronic adaptation or metabolic non-response

Fat: Decreased

Starvation

Exercise

Continued stress response

Some anabolic therapies (particularly when combined with exercise)

That's it!  You are ready to do some case interpretations!  Let’s try this out on a few, neatly fitting profiles.  The following cases are meant to illustrate the process of BIA interpretation utilizing different scenarios.

Click here to go to the Case Studies

Back to Table of Contents

 

Reference:

[85] Pritchard JE, Nowson CA, Wark JD. A worksite program for overweight middle-aged men achieves lesser weight loss with exercise than with dietary change. J Amer Diet Assoc. 1997;97(1):37-42.

 


Copyright © 2001, Hi-R-Ed.org. All courses posted on this site are the property of Hi-R-Ed.org unless otherwise stated. Courses may not be copied or transferred in electronic, printed, or other forms or modified for any purpose without explicit written consent of Hi-R-Ed.org or the copyright owner.

If you are having problems with this website, please contact the webmaster.